Bibcode
Jamet, L.; Pérez, E.; Cerviño, M.; Stasińska, G.; González Delgado, R. M.; Vílchez, J. M.
Bibliographical reference
Astronomy and Astrophysics, v.426, p.399-413 (2004)
Advertised on:
11
2004
Journal
Citations
31
Refereed citations
27
Description
We present the results of a double analysis of the ionizing cluster in
NGC 588, a giant HII region (GHR) in the outskirts of
the nearby galaxy M 33. For this purpose, we obtained
ground based long-slit spectroscopy and combined it with archival ground
based and space borne imaging and spectroscopy, in the wavelength range
1100-9800 Å. A first modeling of the cluster was performed using
integrated properties, such as the spectral energy distribution (SED),
broad band colors, nebular emission Hβ equivalent width, the main
ultraviolet resonance lines, and the presence of Wolf-Rayet star
features. By applying standard assumptions about the initial mass
function (IMF), we were unable to fit satisfactorily these observational
data. This contradictory result led us to carry out a second modeling,
based on a resolved photometric analysis of individual stars in Hubble
Space Telescope (HST) images, by means of finding the best fit isochrone
in color-magnitude diagrams (CMD), and assigning a theoretical SED to
each individual star. The overall SED of the cluster, obtained by
integrating the individual stellar SEDs, is found to fit better the
observed SED than the best solution found through the integrated first
analysis, but at a significantly later stage of evolution of the cluster
of 4.2 Myr, as obtained from the best fit to the CMD. A comparative
analysis of both methods traces the different results to the effects of
statistical fluctuations in the upper end of the IMF, which are
significant in NGC 588, with a computed cluster mass
of 5600 M⊙, as predicted by Cerviño et al. (2002,
A&A, 381, 51). We discuss the results in terms of the strong
influence of the few most massive stars, six in the case of NGC
588, that dominate the overall SED and, in particular, the
ionizing far ultraviolet range beyond the Lyman limit.
Tables 1, 2, 4, Figs. 1, 2, 9, 10 12, 13 and Appendix A are only
available in electronic form at http://www.edpsciences.org