Bibcode
Norton, A. A.; Graham, J. Pietarila; Ulrich, R. K.; Schou, J.; Tomczyk, S.; Liu, Y.; Lites, B. W.; López Ariste, A.; Bush, R. I.; Socas-Navarro, H.; Scherrer, P. H.
Bibliographical reference
Solar Physics, Volume 239, Issue 1-2, pp. 69-91
Advertised on:
12
2006
Journal
Citations
115
Refereed citations
100
Description
We present a study of two spectral lines, Fe I 6173 Å and Ni I
6768 Å, that were candidates to be used in the Helioseismic and
Magnetic Imager (HMI) for observing Doppler velocity and the vector
magnetic field. The line profiles were studied using the Mt. Wilson
Observatory, the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter and the Kitt Peak-McMath
Pierce telescope and one-meter Fourier transform spectrometer atlas.
Both Fe I and Ni I profiles have clean continua and no blends that
threaten instrument performance. The Fe I line is 2% deeper, 15%
narrower, and has a 6% smaller equivalent width than the Ni I line. The
potential of each spectral line to recover pre-assigned solar conditions
is tested using a least-squares minimization technique to fit
Milne-Eddington models to tens of thousands of line profiles that have
been sampled at five spectral positions across the line. Overall, the Fe
I line has a better performance than the Ni I line for
vector-magnetic-field retrieval. Specifically, the Fe I line is able to
determine field strength, longitudinal and transverse flux four times
more accurately than the Ni I line in active regions. Inclination and
azimuthal angles can be recovered to ≈2° above 600 Mx
cm-2 for Fe I and above 1000 Mx cm-2
for Ni I. Therefore, the Fe I line better determines the magnetic-field
orientation in plage, whereas both lines provide good orientation
determination in penumbrae and umbrae. We selected the Fe I spectral
line for use in HMI due to its better performance for magnetic
diagnostics while not sacrificing velocity information. The one
exception to the better performance of the Fe I line arises when high
field strengths combine with high velocities to move the spectral line
beyond the effective sampling range. The higher g eff of Fe I
means that its useful range of velocity values in regions of strong
magnetic field is smaller than Ni I.