Bibcode
Guenther, Heather; Barton, E. J.; Bullock, J. S.; Berrier, J. C.; Zentner, A. R.; Wechsler, R. H.
Bibliographical reference
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #215, #306.02; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, p.303
Advertised on:
1
2010
Citations
0
Refereed citations
0
Description
Environmental statistics provide a necessary means of comparing the
properties of galaxies in different environments and a vital test of
models of galaxy formation within the prevailing, hierarchical, LCDM
cosmological model. We explore counts-in-cylinders, a common statistic
defined as the number of companions of a particular galaxy found within
a given projected radius and redshift interval. Galaxy distributions
with the same two-point correlation functions do not necessarily have
the same companion count distributions. We utilize four models for the
spatial distributions of galaxies, based on N-body simulations, and data
from SDSS DR4 to study the utility of the counts-in-cylinders statistic.
There is a very large scatter between the number of companions a galaxy
has and its parent halo mass and occupation, limiting the utility of
this statistic for certain kinds of environmental studies. We also show
that prevalent, empirical models of galaxy clustering that match
observed two- and three-point clustering statistics well fail to
reproduce some aspects of the observed distribution of
counts-in-cylinders on 1, 3 and 6-Mpc/h scales. All models that we
explore underpredict the fraction of galaxies with few or no companions
in 3 and 6-Mpc/h cylinders. Roughly 7% of galaxies in the real universe
are significantly more isolated within a 6 hMpc/h cylinder than the
galaxies in any of the models we use. Simple, phenomenological models
that map galaxies to dark matter halos fail to reproduce high-order
clustering statistics in low-density environments.